[Editor's note: af]
Estrogenic Chemicals: The Hidden Cause for Belly Fat
Part one by Ori Hofmekler part two composed/edited by Al Forsberg
Part One
The Solution – Certain Compounds in Plants Can Help Counter Attack the Problem, Get You Leaner and Healthier
Can certain food compounds be the secret weapon to destroy stubborn belly fat, ignite energy and – most surprisingly – get a leaner and stronger body? Is it true that adding certain missing plant compounds to our diet can make us sexier and healthier?
Yes! But you need to know what to do, or you probably will still bloat up and suffer.
All men and women alike are exposed to estrogenic chemicals day by day. Known as xenoestrogens, they are capable of mimicking estrogen activity in the body. The ongoing assaults of these chemicals affect the body like excess estrogens, with overwhelming and sometimes devastating consequences.
It is almost impossible to avoid these estrogen mimickers…
They’re in the air, car emissions, detergents, paints, nail polishes, lotions, soaps, plastics, food and water. Most notable sources of estrogen chemicals are petroleum based products, pollutants, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and plastics.
One may suffer from some of the following symptoms: weight gain in the waist (belly fat) and other areas that virtually resist fat burning, allergies, recurring sinus infections, water retention, fatigue and mood swings, all of which may be symptoms of excess estrogen due to estrogenic chemicals.
Xenoestrogens are not the only reason for excess estrogen. Obesity, aging, birth control pills, estrogen replacement drugs (HRT), anabolic steroids, hormones in meat and dairy, and a poor diet are also major contributors to excess estrogen and its related disorders in men and women.
Normally, estrogen is balanced with other hormones in the body such as progesterone in women and testosterone in men. A certain hormonal balance must be maintained for proper metabolic functions. When that hormonal balance is interrupted, disorders and diseases occur.
A most notable sign of aging is the loss of hormones that balance estrogen. With age, there is also an increased conversion of androgens to estrogen in both sexes, all of which leaves the body with an excess of renegade estrogen. Ironically, perimenopausal women, who initially lose estrogen, suffer from increased levels of excess estrogen due to the aforementioned reasons.
In summary, our “estrogen cup is full”. Estrogenic chemicals cause a “spill over” effect in the form of excess estrogen and its related disorders.
Weight Gain and Other Disorders
The “thickening” of women’s bodies and the “softening” of men’s bodies are often related to excess estrogen.
When in excess, estrogen promotes the growth of estrogen sensitive tissues, leading to an increased size of adipose (fat) tissues in the waist, belly and other estrogen sensitive fat tissues: For men, typically in the belly and chest; for women, in the belly, lower butt, upper thighs and sometimes in the back of the arms. In some cases, excess estrogen causes feminization of men’s bodies with conditions such as genecomastia.
Estrogen sensitive fat tissues are also called “stubborn fat” due to their high resistance to fat burning. Generally, not even diet or exercise can help remove this estrogen sensitive tenacious fat. Excess estrogen works in a vicious cycle. Estrogen promotes fat gain, and the enlarged fat tissue produces more estrogen within its cells, which then promotes more fat gain, and so on.
The only solution is to attack the core of the problem, which is excess estrogen.
Excess estrogen can lead into overgrowth of other estrogen sensitive tissues such as the lining of the endometrium (endometriosis), or ovarian fibroids in women, and the enlargement of the prostate gland in men. If untreated, such conditions can lead into cancer.
Considering all of the above, it becomes evidently clear that we’re living today under an ever-growing risk to get fatter and sicker due to estrogenic chemicals and other factors that contribute to excess estrogens. The question is what can be done to lower this risk? How can we defend our lives against excess estrogen?
Defense against excess estrogen
The problem of excess estrogen is gradually gaining recognition. However, there is still much confusion among mainstream nutritionists and medical authorities as to how to address this problem. In many cases, the problem of excess estrogen is overlooked or ignored, leaving patients with almost no choice but taking drugs, which often accelerates the problem, causing severe and even mortal side effects.
The solution to excess estrogen requires the means to counterattack estrogen and its excess in a natural and safe way.
Estrogen isn’t one hormone, but rather a group of hormones and their metabolites. Estrogen hormones and their metabolites compete with each other on binding to estrogen receptors. Most important, estrogen can convert into two kinds of metabolites: beneficial and harmful – one or the other.
The key to defend the body against excess estrogen is by countering its excess and by shifting its metabolism into producing beneficial antioxidant, anti-cancerous metabolites, instead of toxic cancer promoting metabolites.
It is now known that certain compounds in plants (belonging to the family of flavonoids and indoles) can help counter estrogen actions, and defend the body against its excess. Called estrogen inhibitors, these compounds work in three different ways:
- Inhibit estrogen production (bind and de-activate
the cytochrome P 450 aromatase enzyme that converts
androgens to estrogen)
- Lower estrogen receptors activity
- Shift estrogen metabolism to produce beneficial
metabolites
Recent lab studies found that estrogen inhibitors work better when combined together. A stack of estrogen inhibitors have shown to provide a superior defense against excess estrogen. Though the research on plant estrogen inhibitors is still young, there is a growing amount of evidence as to the potential benefits of plant compounds (phytonutrients) in treating metabolic problems, including estrogen related disorders and lowering the risk for cancer.
It is very likely that the human body has been primarily pre-programmed to be nourished and protected by phytonutrients. Unfortunately, due to industrial harvesting and processing methods, food today is often deficient in most beneficial phytonutrients, leaving people with inadequate nutritional defenses. Estrogen inhibiting phytonutrients are a major missing link in the diet.
To effectively support a healthy hormonal system, it is critically important to provide the body with sufficient amounts of estrogen inhibiting phytonutrients to balance against the overwhelming surplus of estrogenic food substances and chemicals in the diet.
The concept of healthy nutrition should be re-defined. New nutritional guidelines should direct people on how to incorporate estrogen inhibitors with estrogen promoters to effectively balance their diets.
The Solution
Certain compounds in plants, called flavonoids and indoles, are known to possess antioxidant and anti-cancerous properties. Recent studies reveal that some of these compounds have the capacity to affect estrogen metabolism, some work as estrogen inhibitors whereas others work as estrogen promoters.
Since we live in an “over-estrogenic world”, loaded with overwhelming amounts of estrogenic chemicals, it makes sense to regard estrogen promoters as “bad guys” and estrogen inhibitors as “good guys”. In an ideal world, both anti-estrogenic and pro-estrogenic substances play important roles in supporting our metabolic system.
Nevertheless, due to the ever growing problem of estrogen dominance, with an excess of estrogen chemicals in our lives, it makes sense to regard estrogen promoters as part of the problem and vice versa, estrogen inhibitors should be regarded as part of the solution.
“Good Guys” vs. “Bad Guys”
In a nut shell, the “good guys” are estrogen inhibiting compounds in plants (flavonoids and indoles). Found in passiflora, chamomile, bee products, citrus fruits, onion, garlic, and cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts and cabbage). Other beneficial estrogen modulators are omega 3 fatty acids (N-3), derived from flaxseeds, hempseeds and fatty fish.
On the other side, there are the “bad guys”, the estrogen promoters. This list consists of pesticides and herbicides in fruits and vegetables, hormones in meat and dairy, soy and products high in soy isoflavones, other estrogenic isoflavones, plastic derivatives in packed food and water, diets high in animal fat and excessive consumption of omega 6 rich oils (such as canola, corn, safflower and soy oils).
Note that processing increases the concentration of the already existing estrogenic compounds in food. For that matter, processed soy products may be more estrogenic than soy beans (edamame). For the same reason, commercially processed milk or whey protein products may be more estrogenic than regular milk or yogurt, unless they’re organic or pesticide free.
Some compounds are neutral to estrogen. Omega 9 fatty acids (monounsaturated oil) such as in olive oil, nuts and seeds are neutral and safe to use. To a certain degree, so are fruits with a peel such as bananas or avocados, which are safer than unpeeled fruits such as conventional grapes or strawberries.
In conclusion, to effectively defend the body against excess estrogen, one should increase the intake of estrogen inhibiting compounds, and decrease the intake of estrogen promoting compounds in the diet.
Due to the fact that the typical diet is low in some estrogen inhibiting nutrients and almost totally deficient in others, it is highly recommended to supplement with estrogen inhibitors to cover the bases, and provide the body with sufficient amounts of ammunition to fight back excess estrogen.
It’s important to be proactive and make the right choices of food and supplements. All essential vitamins, minerals and antioxidants must be provided to support the body’s metabolism. Together with estrogen inhibitors, such nourishment can help enhance the liver’s capacity to detoxify and neutralize excess estrogen, finally creating the right metabolic environment within the body to get leaner and healthier.
——————
Part Two
Xenoestrogens are novel, industrially made compounds, that have estrogenic effects and differ chemically from archiestrogens (ancient, naturally occurring) produced by living organisms. Their potential ecological and human health impact is under study.
As a heterogeneous group of chemicals that are hormonally active agents, xenoestrogens are similar to other estrogens , such as phytoestrogens (estrogenic substances from plants) and mycoestrogens (estrogenic substances from fungi, which can be considered as one type of mycotoxin). Xenoestrogens include pharmacological estrogens (estrogenic action is an intended effect, as in the drug ethinyl estradiol), but other chemicals may also have estrogenic effects. Xenoestrogens have been introduced into the environment by industrial, agricultural and chemical companies and consumers only in the last 70 years or so, but archiestrogens have been a ubiquitous part of the environment even before the existence of the human race.
Effects
Xenoestrogens have been implicated in a variety of medical problems, but there has been little hard evidence of damage. The potential for adverse effects is considered real by some.[2]
There is a concern that xenoestrogens may act as false messengers and disrupt the process of reproduction. Xenoestrogens, like all estrogens, can increase growth of the endometrium, so treatments for endometriosis include avoidance of products which contain them. Likewise, they are avoided in order to prevent the onset or aggravation of adenomyosis.
Studies have implicated observations of disturbances in wildlife with estrogenic exposure. For example, discharge from human settlement including runoff and water flowing out of wastewater treatment plants release a large amount of xenoestrogens into streams, which lead to immense alterations in aquatic life. With a bioaccumulation factor of 105 –106, fish are extremely susceptible to pollutants . Streams in more arid conditions are thought to have more effects due to higher concentrations of the chemicals arising from lack of dilution.
When comparing fish from above a wastewater treatment plant and below a wastewater treatment plant, studies found disrupted ovarian and testicular histopathology, gonadal intersex, reduced gonad size, vitellogenin induction, and altered sex ratios .
The sex ratios are female biased because xenoestrogens interrupt gonadal configuration causing complete or partial sex reversal. When comparing adjacent populations of white sucker fish, the exposed female fish can have up to five oocyte stages and asynchronously developing ovaries versus the unexposed female fish who usually have two oocyte stages and group-synchronously developing ovaries. Previously, this type of difference has only been found between tropical and temperate species.
Sperm concentrations and motility perimeters are reduced in male fish exposed to xenoestrogens in addition to disrupt stages of spermatogenesis . Moreover, xenoestrogens have been leading to vast amounts of intersex in fish. For example, one study indicates the numbers of intersex in white sucker fish to be equal to the number of males in the population downstream of a waste water treatment plant.
No intersex members were found upstream from the plant. Also, they found differences in the proportion of testicular and ovarian tissue and it’s degree of organization between the intersex fish . Furthermore, xenoestrogens expose fish to CYP1A inducers through inhibiting a putative labile protein and enhancing the Ah receptor, which has been linked to epizootics of cancer and the initiation of tumors .
The induction of CYP1A has been established to be a good bioindicator for xenoestrogen exposure. In addition, xenoestrogens stimulate vitellogenin (Vtg), which acts as a nutrient reserve, and Zona readiata proteins (Zrp), which forms eggshells. Therefore, Vtg and Zrp are biomarkers to exposure for fish .
Another potential effect of xenoestrogens is on oncogenes, specifically in relation to breast cancer. Some scientists doubt that xenoestrogens have any significant biological effect, in the concentrations found in the environment. However, there is substantial evidence in a variety of recent studies to indicate that xenoestrogens can increase breast cancer growtt in [[tissue culture.
It has been suggested that very low levels of a xenoestrogen, Bisphenol A, could affect fetal neural signalling more than higher levels, indicating that classical models where dose equals response may not be applicable in susceptible tissue. As this study involved intra-cerebellar injections, its relevance to environmental exposures is unclear, as is the role of an estrogenic effect compared to some other toxic effect of bisphenol A.
Other scientists argue that the observed effects are spurious and inconsistent, or that the quantities of the agents are too low to have any effect. A 1997 survey of scientists in fields pertinent to evaluating estrogens found that 13 percent regarded the health threats from xenoestrogens as "major," 62 percent as "minor" or "none," and 25 percent were unsure.
There has been speculation that falling sperm counts in males may be due to increased oestrogen exposure in utero. Sharpe in a 2005 review indicated that external estrogenic substances are too weak in their cumulative effects to alter male reproductive functioning, but indicates that the situation appears to be more complex as external chemicals may affect the internal testosterone-estrogen balance.
Presence
The ubiquitous presence of such estrogenic substances is a significant health concern, both individually and for a population. Life relies on the transmission of biochemical information to the next generation, and the presence of xenoestrogens may interfere with this transgenerational information process through "chemical confusion" (Vidaeff and Sever), who state: "The results do not support with certainty the view that environmental estrogens contribute to an increase in male reproductive disorders, neither do they provide sufficient grounds to reject such a hypothesis."
A 2008 report demonstrates further evidence of widespread effects of feminizing chemicals on male development in each class of vertebrate species as a worldwide phenomenon. 99% percent of over 100,000 recently introduced chemicals are underregulated, according to the European Commission.
Agencies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety are charged to address these issues.
Chemicals shown to have estrogenic effects
- alkylphenols (intermediate chemicals used in the manufacture of other chemicals)
- atrazine (weedkiller)
- 4-Methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) (sunscreen lotions)
- butylated hydroxyanisole / BHA (food preservative)
- bisphenol A (monomer for polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resin; antioxidant in plasticizers)
- dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (one of the breakdown products of DDT)
- dieldrin (insecticide)
- DDT (insecticide)
- endosulfan (insecticide)
- erythrosine / FD&C Red No. 3
- ethinylestradiol (combined oral contraceptive pill) (released into the environment as a xenoestrogen)
- heptachlor (insecticide)
- lindane / hexachlorocyclohexane (insecticide)
- metalloestrogens (a class of inorganic xenoestrogens)
- methoxychlor (insecticide)
- nonylphenol and derivatives (industrial surfactants; emulsifiers for emulsion polymerization; laboratory detergents; pesticides)
- pentachlorophenol (general biocide and wood preservative)
- polychlorinated biphenyls / PCBs (in electrical oils, lubricants, adhesives, paints)
- parabens (lotions)
- phenosulfothiazine (a red dye)
- phthalates (plasticizers)
- DEHP (plasticizer for PVC)
- Propyl gallate (used to protect oils and fats in products from oxidation)
[Editor's note: af]
.
.
Last 15 Comments